Do we actually need a blockchain?

Quite possibly not - most use cases are better served by a conventional database, and we will say so. A ledger earns its cost when parties who do not fully trust each other need shared, tamper-evident records.

Which platforms and chains do you work with?

Chosen per use case - public or permissioned - based on cost, privacy and who needs to participate. We have no chain to promote.

How do you handle smart-contract security?

With great care: rigorous build, audit and testing before deployment, because deployed contracts are costly to change and their bugs are unforgiving.

Can it integrate with our existing systems?

Yes - that integration is most of the value. On-chain and off-chain are designed together, so the ledger is part of a working whole.

Blockchain development

Most blockchain projects start from the technology and go looking for a problem; those fail. Where parties who do not fully trust each other need shared, tamper-evident records, a ledger can be exactly right - we build for that case, and we will tell you plainly when a database would serve you better.

Service details

At a glance

Smart contracts, built and audited carefully
Traceability and provenance across parties
Tamper-evident, auditable records
Integrated with your conventional systems

The question before the technology

A blockchain is a slow, expensive database with one remarkable property: nobody has to trust anybody for the records to be trustworthy. If your problem does not need that property, you do not need a ledger - and we say so before you spend money learning it the hard way. If it does, the fit can be excellent: provenance, multi-party traceability, verification without a referee.

Built with appropriate paranoia

On-chain mistakes are unforgiving - a bug in a deployed smart contract cannot be quietly patched on a Friday. So contracts get built and audited with unusual care and tested thoroughly before deployment, and the design keeps everything off-chain that has no business being on it.

Smart contracts audited and tested before deployment
On-chain kept minimal by design
Public or permissioned, chosen for the use case

Part of a working whole

A ledger that does not talk to your existing systems is an island, and islands do not change businesses. We integrate the on-chain component with the conventional infrastructure around it, so the result is one working system rather than a proof-of-concept with a press release.

Frequently asked questions

Do we actually need a blockchain?: Quite possibly not - most use cases are better served by a conventional database, and we will say so. A ledger earns its cost when parties who do not fully trust each other need shared, tamper-evident records.
Which platforms and chains do you work with?: Chosen per use case - public or permissioned - based on cost, privacy and who needs to participate. We have no chain to promote.
How do you handle smart-contract security?: With great care: rigorous build, audit and testing before deployment, because deployed contracts are costly to change and their bugs are unforgiving.
Can it integrate with our existing systems?: Yes - that integration is most of the value. On-chain and off-chain are designed together, so the ledger is part of a working whole.

Ready to talk through Blockchain development?

Book a free 30-minute consultation with a senior engineer to see how we can help.

Book a consultation

Blockchain development

Service details

At a glance

The question before the technology

Built with appropriate paranoia

Part of a working whole

Frequently asked questions

Ready to talk through Blockchain development?

Other services

Custom software

API development & systems integration

Security by default